JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
WORLD POWERS IN THE LAST DAYS (END OF AGE OF GRACE NOT THE WORLD)
EUROPEAN UNION-KING OF WEST-DAN 9:26-27,DAN 7:23-24,DAN 11:40,REV 13:1-10
EGYPT-KING OF THE SOUTH-DAN 11:40
RUSSIA-KING OF THE NORTH-EZEK 38:1-2,EZEK 39:1-3
CHINA-KING OF THE EAST-DAN 11:44,REV 9:16,18
VATICAN-RELIGIOUS LEADER-REV 13:11-18,REV 17:4-5,9,18
WORLD TERRORISM
GENESIS 6:11-13
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.(WORLD TERRORISM,MURDERS)(HAMAS IN HEBREW IS VIOLENCE)
12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence (TERRORISM)(HAMAS) through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
LEVITICUS 26:16
16 I also will do this unto you; I will even appoint over you( sudden) terror(ISM), consumption, and the burning ague, that shall consume the eyes, and cause sorrow of heart: and ye shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it.
GENESIS 16:11-12
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her,(HAGAR) Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael;(FATHER OF THE ARAB/MUSLIMS) because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
12 And he (ISHMAEL-FATHER OF THE ARAB-MUSLIMS) will be a wild (DONKEY-JACKASS) man;(ISLAM IS A FAKE AND DANGEROUS SEX FOR MURDER CULT) his hand will be against every man,(ISLAM HATES EVERYONE) and every man's hand against him;(PROTECTING THEMSELVES FROM BEING BEHEADED) and he (ISHMAEL ARAB/MUSLIM) shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.(LITERAL-THE ARABS LIVE WITH THEIR BRETHERN JEWS)
ISAIAH 14:12-14
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer,(SATAN) son of the morning!(HEBREW-CRECENT MOON-ISLAM) how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I (SATAN HAS EYE TROUBLES) will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.(AND 1/3RD OF THE ANGELS OF HEAVEN FELL WITH SATAN AND BECAME DEMONS)
JOHN 16:2
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.(ISLAM MURDERS IN THE NAME OF MOON GOD ALLAH OF ISLAM)
UPDATE-NOV 17,15-12:00AM
Hollande announces security pact, calls for military assistance By Eric Maurice-euobserver
BRUSSELS, 16. Nov, 19:18-"France is at war" was the first sentence of President Francois Hollande's speech to an exceptional sitting of both houses of the French parliament in Versailles Monday afternoon (16 November). "Terrorism will not destroy the republic; it is the republic that will destroy terrorism," was the last.Between the two declarations, Hollande delivered a speech aimed at creating national unity around a "security pact" and at triggering an international response following Friday's terror attacks in Paris.The French president announced that on Tuesday France will invoke the European mutual defense clause.Rather than article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which requires assistance when a member state is "the object of a terrorist attack", France chose to trigger article 42.7 of the Treaty on European Union.This article states that "if a member state is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other member states shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power."This is consistent with Hollande's repeated claim that France was attacked by an "army of terrorists" operating from abroad.The attacks were "planned in Syria, organized in Belgium, and perpetrated with French complicity," he told MPs and senators.A large and unique coalition'-"The enemy is Daesh," he said, using the Arabic name for the Islamic State group."We shall not just contain it, but destroy it," he said, adding that France will "intensify its operations" in Syria following Monday's raids.Hollande also wants to build "a large and unique coalition" against the terrorist group.He announced that France has asked for a meeting and a resolution from the UN Security Council.He also said that he will soon meet US and Russian presidents, Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin, "to join our forces and reach a conclusion that has been too long overdue."" We are not in a war of civilisations, because they [the terrorists] don't have any," Hollande said.France was attacked, he said, because "it is the land of freedom and of human rights.""Terrorists believe that people will allow themselves to be impressed by horror," he said. "That is not the case," he assured the parliamentarians. "They are the ones who will go down in history as the losers.""We shall continue to work, go out, live and influence the world," he said, adding that the UN climate conference will still take place in Paris in December."French killed French," he told parliamentarians."The France that assassins wanted to kill is youth in all its diversity," he said. "The only crime of these young people [who were killed] was to live."Respect the rule of law'-The president assured those assembled that France will "eradicate terrorism while continuing to respect our values and without losing what is guaranteed by the rule of law."He did, however, announce a set of measures to harden anti-terrorism laws, including changes to France's constitution. Hollande asked the parliament to vote before the end of the week to extend the state of emergency for three months, with provisions to facilitate administrative, rather than judiciary, searches and house arrests.The articles of the constitution organizing the state of emergency and "full powers" for the president are "no longer suited to the current situation", he said, and proposed that authorities be allowed "adequate means to take exceptional measures", without having to have recourse to the state of emergency.In the debate that followed Hollande's address, the group leader of Les Republicains, the main opposition party, said that "nothing justifies" any change to the constitution.Hollande also said that terrorists with a double citizenship, "including those who were born French", should be stripped of their French citizenship.He announced the creation of 8,500 jobs in police, justice and border administration, a freeze on staff reduction in the army, and said that reservists would be called to form "a home guard".Hollande admitted these measures will worsen France's financial situation.Nonetheless, "the security pact prevails over the stability pact," he said, in a soundbite also aimed at the EU Commission, which supervises EU member states' budgets.
Belgian police hunt Paris suspect in Brussels neighbourhood By Nikolaj Nielsen-euobserver
BRUSSELS, 16. Nov, 17:40-A half-dozen black-hooded Belgian police are standing in front of two ladders behind the Foundry park in Molenbeek, a neighbourhood in Brussels.Amid drizzling rain they peer up onto the roof as police track down a man they believe may have been part of the Paris shootings on Friday. At the other end of the street, a hooded officer enters a pizzeria.One loud explosion is followed by another. No arrests are made.A few streets away on Chaussee de Gand, shopkeepers and residents appear unaware of the drama unfolding nearby.The operation had begun earlier in the day, just as Molenbeek mayor Francoise Schepmans was telling reporters that she’s shocked one of the Paris suicide bombers Brahim Abdeslam, a French national, had been a local who ran a cafe. The cafe was shut down earlier this month.“This doesn’t at all correspond to this commune, which has some 100,000 inhabitants, with its diverse neighbourhoods, with a lot of cultural and social life,” she said on Monday (16 November).Brahim’s brother Salah is now the object of a massive manhunt after some 129 people were shot dead in carefully staged attacks in Paris.The other brother worked for the Brussels municipality and is described by deputy mayor Ahmed El Khannouss, who knows him, as friendly and kind.“It was a family that lives in Molenbeek, they still live here. They never made any problems, it was a family that had a normal life,” said El Khannouss.El Khannouss said no one had suspected any of the brothers had extremist tendencies.“Nobody today could have imagined that a movement some 10,000 kilometres from here has the capacity to radicalise the youth, nobody was ready for that, in Belgium or any other place,” he said.The Abdeslam family is composed of four brothers and one sister.Schepmans says two of the brothers were known for making trouble.Three lived in a flat just across from the city hall where Schepmans spoke.Below, the corner cafe is shut. Nearby, vendors shuffle their wares onto the street baffled by the mass of journalists standing in the adjoining city hall square.Schepmans said the municipality had stripped the three of housing benefits in 2013 because their monthly earnings were too high. One of them, she said, then kicked down the door of a municipal councilor in retaliation.She says around 30 young people had left to fight alongside the Islamic militants in Syria, including those suspected but not confirmed of having left.Molenbeek has the second largest concentration of young people, compared to any other municipality in Belgium.It is also among the poorest, with an average unemployment rate of 35 percent among the Maghrebin, compared to the 21 percent average throughout the rest of Brussels, according to El Khannouss.But one local, who did not want to give his name, and who does work with some of the mosques in the neighbourhood said the main problem isn’t poverty or lack of work.“The problem are ideas, not the people,” he said.He said Wahhabism, a conservative strand of Islam, has taken root and attracted a youth who before had no particular interest in religion.Many of the mosques, he said, are being subsidised by Saudi Arabia.Dave Sinardet, a Belgian political scientist, said that while Wahhabism is likely having an influence on some of the people living in the neighbourhood, the reasons behind the broader phenomenon are more complex and diverse.“The thing I noticed is that a lot of people tend to project their own truths and their own convictions on what is happening,” he said.
Mogherini: This is the most serious war of our times By Eszter Zalan-euobserver
BRUSSELS, 16. Nov, 19:42-The fight against the Islamic State and the conflict in Syria is the gravest war we face in our times, the EU diplomatic chief said on Monday (16 November), following the meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.“This is not just a crisis, but the most serious war of our times,” Federica Mogherini told reporters.She repeated that Friday’s terrorist attacks in Paris that killed 129 people highlight the importance of talks on Syria in Vienna.Reflecting on the talks in Vienna on Syria over the weekend, Mogherini said that there is a sense of urgency coming from Europe, pressed both by terrorist threats and a refugee crisis, that cannot be ignored by any of the actors around the negotiating table.“This needs to come up with results sooner rather than later,” she said. "It must be a matter of months, not years."Mogherini noted that a political solution in Syria “would be the best condition to defeat Daesh,” using the Arabic name for the Islamic State group. “Putting an end to the civil war would definitely create the conditions to defeat Daesh on the ground.”As the meeting got underway the ministers stood for a minute of silence to honour the victims. European defence ministers will meet on Tuesday and discuss France's invoking of a mutual defence clause in the EU Treaty that calls for member states’ to help another member state that comes under attack.-Fear can destroy-Mogherini said she fears European societies might think that it is diversity that weakens and threatens the continent. “It is actually fear that can destroy our society from within,” she said.“Coming together in our differences is a strength,” Mogherini warned. "We need to hold onto this."The EU diplomatic chief also stressed that the Paris attacks represent an internal threat to the EU.“The profile of the terrorists so far identified tells us this is an internal threat,” she said.Mogherini added: “It's all EU citizens so far. This can change with the hours, but so far this is an issue of internal domestic security with strong links to an entity, a terrorist organization that has its main strongpoint in Syria and Iraq.”Echoing her boss, EU commission president Jean-Claude Juncker’s comments on Sunday, Mogherini said there should be no mix-up or confusion between refugees and terrorists.“It would be extremely dangerous and counter productive for our continent,” she warned, saying the refugees are fleeing the same threats that Europe now faces.
China security chief calls for greater 'de-radicalization' efforts-Reuters-nov 16,15-yahoonews
BEIJING (Reuters) - China needs to deepen its fight against separatists, intensify "de-radicalization" efforts, and increase global cooperation to defend against terrorism, the country's domestic security chief wrote on Tuesday.The Chinese government says it is facing a threat from Islamist militants and separatists in the far western region of Xinjiang, home to the Muslim Uighur people and where hundreds have died in unrest in the past three years or so.China's foreign minister has already called for greater international cooperation in its fight against Xinjiang radicals in the wake of the Paris attacks at the weekend.Writing in the ruling Communist Party's official People's Daily, Meng Jianzhu made no direct mention of Paris, but said a country's "rise and fall" would depend on how it secured itself."We must ensure that political security is put in first place, tightly prevent and strike hard against the infiltrating, subversive activities of enemy forces in accordance with the law," Meng wrote."We must deepen the anti-seperatist struggle and resolutely maintain ethnic and national unity," he added."Always maintain high pressure on violent terrorist activities ... further deepen de-radical ization efforts and international anti-terrorism cooperation to form a protective anti-terror security screen." Rights groups and exiles say Xinjiang's violence stems more from widespread resentment at Chinese controls on religion and culture rather than being committed by a well-organized militant group. China strongly denies abusing human rights in Xinjiang.Uighurs have traditionally followed a moderate form of Islam but many have begun adopting practices more common in Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, such as full-face veils for women, as China has stepped up security in recent years.The government has responded by cracking down on what it sees as overt signs of religiosity, like veils or beards.Meng said that China needs to build on the legal basis of its sweeping new national security law, passed earlier this year to widespread criticism from rights groups. Foreign business lobbies have also criticized the law, which included measures to tighten cyber security for key network infrastructure and information systems.China should push forward with three other laws, on anti-terror, the management of foreign non-governmental organizations and cybersecurity, Meng added, without giving details.The state also needs to "perfect" its national security approval system for things like investment projects and internet technology, Meng said.Foreign firms fear those measures could require them t make products in China or release information to inspectors that could compromise control of intellectual property.(Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)
Why the Paris attacks overshadowed Beirut bombings-By Caitlin Dickson-NOV 16,15-YAHOO NEWS
It might be nearly impossible to find a social media-using member of Western society whose Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter feeds were not filled with tributes to Paris this weekend — whether in the form of French flag filtered photos, a widely shared illustration of the Eiffel Tower at the center of a peace sign, or simply the hashtag #PrayForParis.But, as the New York Times pointed out on Sunday, a scan of the same social media feeds would not likely produce much evidence of the fact that, just one day before over 120 people were killed in a string of consecutive attacks around Paris, dual suicide bombings took more than 40 lives in the Lebanese city of Beirut — the Islamic State terrorist organization (also known as ISIS) having claimed responsibility for both. Once news of the Beirut attacks did start to spread online, however, the response was less an outpouring of support and more an outpouring of outrage and attempts to blame either the media or the public for overlooking Lebanon.In a post at Medium, journalist Martin Belam expressed his frustration over a widely shared tweet claiming that “no media” had covered the Beirut attacks when, in reality, Belam wrote, “search Google News and you will find pages and pages of reports of the attacks in Beirut. Pages and pages and pages. Over 1,286 articles in fact — lots of which pre-date the attacks in Paris.”That same tweet elicited a similar reaction from Vox’s Max Fisher, who wrote, “The New York Times covered it. The Washington Post, in addition to running an Associated Press story on it, sent reporter Hugh Naylor to cover the blasts and then write a lengthy piece on their aftermath. The Economist had a thoughtful piece reflecting on the attack's significance. CNN, which rightly or wrongly has a reputation for least-common-denominator news judgment, aired one segment after another on the Beirut bombings. Even the Daily Mail, a British tabloid most known for its gossipy royals coverage, was on the story. And on and on.”Yet, Fisher continued, “these are stories that, like so many stories of previous bombings and mass acts of violence outside of the West, readers have largely ignored.”A request for data on Twitter responses to the Paris attacks was quickly met with a colorful visualization of the #PrayForParis hashtag’s climb from a single tweet to 6.7 million within 10 hours, and another similarly illustrating the trajectory of #PortOuverte. That hashtag (meaning “open door”) was used by Parisians offering shelter to those in need following Friday’s attacks and according to Twitter was tweeted 1 million times in 10 hours.Similar statistics on Twitter’s response to the Beirut attacks, however, were neither as readily available nor brightly illustrated. A Twitter spokesperson referred Yahoo News to the public analytics service Topsy, which showed that the number of tweets containing the keyword “Beirut” started to climb from an average of around zero on Wednesday and peaked at 142,658 on Friday.Facebook did not respond to a request for data on its users’ activity relating to the events in Paris or Beirut.Pamela Rutledge, a professor of media psychology and director of the Media Psychology Research Center at Fielding Graduate University in Santa Barbara, argues that the disparity between reactions to the events in Paris and Beirut from Westerners, and Americans in particular, is more an issue of understanding than wilful ignorance.“People in the U.S. are much more familiar with Paris than Beirut,” Rutledge told Yahoo News. “We have this image of Paris as the place where Hemingway wrote or the place where you learn to paint or cook. “There’s this long history — they gave us the Statue of Liberty for heaven’s sake — and an understanding of Paris in each of our brains.”Most Americans, she explained, can easily visualize Paris in their minds, whether they are recalling an image from their own experience as a tourist or a scene from one of the countless movies set in the French city. The Middle East, on the other hand, is generally more difficult to grasp.“It’s a hugely diverse area of the world, but our sense of it is very limited by the small amount of information that we have,” said Rutledge. “And because many of the areas, especially around Beirut, have been in turmoil for so long, the images rooted in our brains are of violence and conflict.”“When we hear there’s violence over there, we think, in an uneducated way, ‘Aren’t they always fighting?’ There’s that lack understanding about what's going on there.”Not only is our capacity for empathy tied to our ability to visualize a place or a situation but also, Rutledge said, our brains are hardwired to judge whether something is dangerous based on how relevant we think it is to our own lives. And the Paris attacks, she noted, hit particularly close to home. Friday’s victims were sports fans, concertgoers, and restaurant patrons. The people held hostage at the Bataclan Theater were there to see an American band perform. Among those killed was a college student from California.Such events “shatter our image of how the world is supposed to work,” Rutledge said.Still, while the average American may be inclined to feel more of an emotional response to the attacks in Paris than those in Beirut, Rutledge said she hopes these parallel tragedies might result in greater awareness and a changed perspective.“For a long time people were not taking the ISIS threat seriously because it was in a part of the world that didn’t seem personal, but now it is,” Rutledge said, suggesting that now “people might think, Paris and Beirut are related, and understand people in the Middle East are under attack from ISIS too. We are on the same side here.”
Can governors legally reject Syrian refugees?-Liz Goodwin-Senior National Affairs Reporter-November 16, 2015-YAHOONEWS
At least 16 governors, all but one of them Republican, have vowed not to accept any refugees from Syria into their states in response to the revelation that one of the Paris terrorists may have entered Europe as part of a wave of migrants from the war-torn region. The move complicates the Obama administration’s plan to accept 10,000 Syrians into the country over the next year.“I will not stand complicit to a policy that places the citizens of Alabama in harm’s way,” Gov. Robert Bentley of Alabama announced Monday. Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal also refused to accept any more refugees and demanded that the Obama administration “confirm the identities” of 59 Syrians recently settled in his state. The governors of Indiana, Michigan, Arkansas, Texas, Mississippi, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Maine and Arizona also stated their opposition to accepting Syrian refugees. Meanwhile, presidential candidates Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz have suggested that only Christians from the region should be granted refuge.“That’s shameful. That’s not American, it’s not who we are,“ President Obama responded Monday.These governors are likely standing on shaky ground, as there is no legal way for them to prevent refugee resettlement, according to multiple experts. And their opposition is largely symbolic, since once Syrians (or any refugees) are in the U.S., they have the right to travel anywhere they want, just like any other resident. If the Obama administration wanted to challenge these governors on their threats, they would handily beat them in court, experts say.Lavinia Limon, former director of the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement under Pres. Bill Clinton, said these governors misunderstand the Constitution.“It’s really a question of fundamental freedoms,” Limon said. “If you’re legally residing in the United States, you have the right to move wherever you wish to. We could resettle a refugee in New York City today, and tomorrow they could decide to move to Dallas.”But that might not matter. Refugee resettlement involves the coordination of local nonprofits and government officials with federal agencies, and forcing newly arrived legal residents into communities that don’t want them likely sounds unappealing to everyone involved.“My suspicion is that if a state was firmly opposed to having Syrian refugees in their borders then as an initial matter, the government might choose to put them somewhere else,” said Jack Chin, a law professor at the University of California at Davis. “Why fight that fight?”State Department spokesman Mark Toner’s muted reaction to the governors’ threats on Monday seemed to confirm that suspicion. Toner told reporters Monday that the department’s lawyers were reviewing the question of whether governors could refuse to settle Syrian refugees. He struck a conciliatory note, saying he understood the governors’ concerns but reassured them that the department’s security vetting of Syrian refugees was thorough.“Our approach to this is: You have concerns? Let’s have a dialogue. Let’s try to address those concerns, alleviate those concerns,” Toner said.Limon asked how governors would follow through on their threats, if the government did choose to ignore them.“What are they going to do? Send state marshals to the airports?”The image of a Syrian family being forcibly marched across state lines would not be a winning one.Still, the governors’ move puts pressure on Obama, who has pledged to resettle 10,000 Syrians over the next year. This is less than 1 percent of the more than 4 million people who have fled the country, most of them women and children.The power to set refugee policy was granted to the State Department and the White House through the United States Refugee Act of 1980. So far, this right has gone largely unchallenged by states.“I don’t know of any case law that would precede this where a state has said no, and the federal government had to exercise its power through a lawsuit,” said Westy Egmont, a professor specializing in immigration at Boston College. “I do not think it’s been tested.”Occasionally, federal officials work with local politicians who express concerns about the number of refugees in their state to come to a resolution. Governor Deal of Georgia had asked for a moratorium on refugees a couple of years ago because he felt there were not enough jobs for native Georgians. The federal government paused the refugee flow and addressed Deal’s concerns, and eventually he agreed to accept refugees again.But Limon said this situation is different.“We don’t allow people to dictate on the basis of race, religion or ethnicity about who comes to the community,” she said.If governors wanted to legally deny entry to Syrians, Congress would have to change the law and specifically exclude Syrians from the refugee program for foreign policy reasons. This would most likely be deemed constitutional, according to Chin.The Senate is scheduled to vote on legislation banning so-called sanctuary cities this week — a measure pushed by Sen. Ted Cruz — and it’s possible that Syrian refugees will get brought up as part of the larger debate on that immigration issue. Still, it’s hard to imagine that such a move would pass the Senate, much less be signed into law by Obama.
OTHER FRANCE BOMBING NEWS
http://ift.tt/1S0sxif
WORLD POWERS IN THE LAST DAYS (END OF AGE OF GRACE NOT THE WORLD)
EUROPEAN UNION-KING OF WEST-DAN 9:26-27,DAN 7:23-24,DAN 11:40,REV 13:1-10
EGYPT-KING OF THE SOUTH-DAN 11:40
RUSSIA-KING OF THE NORTH-EZEK 38:1-2,EZEK 39:1-3
CHINA-KING OF THE EAST-DAN 11:44,REV 9:16,18
VATICAN-RELIGIOUS LEADER-REV 13:11-18,REV 17:4-5,9,18
WORLD TERRORISM
GENESIS 6:11-13
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.(WORLD TERRORISM,MURDERS)(HAMAS IN HEBREW IS VIOLENCE)
12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence (TERRORISM)(HAMAS) through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
LEVITICUS 26:16
16 I also will do this unto you; I will even appoint over you( sudden) terror(ISM), consumption, and the burning ague, that shall consume the eyes, and cause sorrow of heart: and ye shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it.
GENESIS 16:11-12
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her,(HAGAR) Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael;(FATHER OF THE ARAB/MUSLIMS) because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
12 And he (ISHMAEL-FATHER OF THE ARAB-MUSLIMS) will be a wild (DONKEY-JACKASS) man;(ISLAM IS A FAKE AND DANGEROUS SEX FOR MURDER CULT) his hand will be against every man,(ISLAM HATES EVERYONE) and every man's hand against him;(PROTECTING THEMSELVES FROM BEING BEHEADED) and he (ISHMAEL ARAB/MUSLIM) shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.(LITERAL-THE ARABS LIVE WITH THEIR BRETHERN JEWS)
ISAIAH 14:12-14
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer,(SATAN) son of the morning!(HEBREW-CRECENT MOON-ISLAM) how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I (SATAN HAS EYE TROUBLES) will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.(AND 1/3RD OF THE ANGELS OF HEAVEN FELL WITH SATAN AND BECAME DEMONS)
JOHN 16:2
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.(ISLAM MURDERS IN THE NAME OF MOON GOD ALLAH OF ISLAM)
UPDATE-NOV 17,15-12:00AM
Hollande announces security pact, calls for military assistance By Eric Maurice-euobserver
BRUSSELS, 16. Nov, 19:18-"France is at war" was the first sentence of President Francois Hollande's speech to an exceptional sitting of both houses of the French parliament in Versailles Monday afternoon (16 November). "Terrorism will not destroy the republic; it is the republic that will destroy terrorism," was the last.Between the two declarations, Hollande delivered a speech aimed at creating national unity around a "security pact" and at triggering an international response following Friday's terror attacks in Paris.The French president announced that on Tuesday France will invoke the European mutual defense clause.Rather than article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which requires assistance when a member state is "the object of a terrorist attack", France chose to trigger article 42.7 of the Treaty on European Union.This article states that "if a member state is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other member states shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power."This is consistent with Hollande's repeated claim that France was attacked by an "army of terrorists" operating from abroad.The attacks were "planned in Syria, organized in Belgium, and perpetrated with French complicity," he told MPs and senators.A large and unique coalition'-"The enemy is Daesh," he said, using the Arabic name for the Islamic State group."We shall not just contain it, but destroy it," he said, adding that France will "intensify its operations" in Syria following Monday's raids.Hollande also wants to build "a large and unique coalition" against the terrorist group.He announced that France has asked for a meeting and a resolution from the UN Security Council.He also said that he will soon meet US and Russian presidents, Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin, "to join our forces and reach a conclusion that has been too long overdue."" We are not in a war of civilisations, because they [the terrorists] don't have any," Hollande said.France was attacked, he said, because "it is the land of freedom and of human rights.""Terrorists believe that people will allow themselves to be impressed by horror," he said. "That is not the case," he assured the parliamentarians. "They are the ones who will go down in history as the losers.""We shall continue to work, go out, live and influence the world," he said, adding that the UN climate conference will still take place in Paris in December."French killed French," he told parliamentarians."The France that assassins wanted to kill is youth in all its diversity," he said. "The only crime of these young people [who were killed] was to live."Respect the rule of law'-The president assured those assembled that France will "eradicate terrorism while continuing to respect our values and without losing what is guaranteed by the rule of law."He did, however, announce a set of measures to harden anti-terrorism laws, including changes to France's constitution. Hollande asked the parliament to vote before the end of the week to extend the state of emergency for three months, with provisions to facilitate administrative, rather than judiciary, searches and house arrests.The articles of the constitution organizing the state of emergency and "full powers" for the president are "no longer suited to the current situation", he said, and proposed that authorities be allowed "adequate means to take exceptional measures", without having to have recourse to the state of emergency.In the debate that followed Hollande's address, the group leader of Les Republicains, the main opposition party, said that "nothing justifies" any change to the constitution.Hollande also said that terrorists with a double citizenship, "including those who were born French", should be stripped of their French citizenship.He announced the creation of 8,500 jobs in police, justice and border administration, a freeze on staff reduction in the army, and said that reservists would be called to form "a home guard".Hollande admitted these measures will worsen France's financial situation.Nonetheless, "the security pact prevails over the stability pact," he said, in a soundbite also aimed at the EU Commission, which supervises EU member states' budgets.
Belgian police hunt Paris suspect in Brussels neighbourhood By Nikolaj Nielsen-euobserver
BRUSSELS, 16. Nov, 17:40-A half-dozen black-hooded Belgian police are standing in front of two ladders behind the Foundry park in Molenbeek, a neighbourhood in Brussels.Amid drizzling rain they peer up onto the roof as police track down a man they believe may have been part of the Paris shootings on Friday. At the other end of the street, a hooded officer enters a pizzeria.One loud explosion is followed by another. No arrests are made.A few streets away on Chaussee de Gand, shopkeepers and residents appear unaware of the drama unfolding nearby.The operation had begun earlier in the day, just as Molenbeek mayor Francoise Schepmans was telling reporters that she’s shocked one of the Paris suicide bombers Brahim Abdeslam, a French national, had been a local who ran a cafe. The cafe was shut down earlier this month.“This doesn’t at all correspond to this commune, which has some 100,000 inhabitants, with its diverse neighbourhoods, with a lot of cultural and social life,” she said on Monday (16 November).Brahim’s brother Salah is now the object of a massive manhunt after some 129 people were shot dead in carefully staged attacks in Paris.The other brother worked for the Brussels municipality and is described by deputy mayor Ahmed El Khannouss, who knows him, as friendly and kind.“It was a family that lives in Molenbeek, they still live here. They never made any problems, it was a family that had a normal life,” said El Khannouss.El Khannouss said no one had suspected any of the brothers had extremist tendencies.“Nobody today could have imagined that a movement some 10,000 kilometres from here has the capacity to radicalise the youth, nobody was ready for that, in Belgium or any other place,” he said.The Abdeslam family is composed of four brothers and one sister.Schepmans says two of the brothers were known for making trouble.Three lived in a flat just across from the city hall where Schepmans spoke.Below, the corner cafe is shut. Nearby, vendors shuffle their wares onto the street baffled by the mass of journalists standing in the adjoining city hall square.Schepmans said the municipality had stripped the three of housing benefits in 2013 because their monthly earnings were too high. One of them, she said, then kicked down the door of a municipal councilor in retaliation.She says around 30 young people had left to fight alongside the Islamic militants in Syria, including those suspected but not confirmed of having left.Molenbeek has the second largest concentration of young people, compared to any other municipality in Belgium.It is also among the poorest, with an average unemployment rate of 35 percent among the Maghrebin, compared to the 21 percent average throughout the rest of Brussels, according to El Khannouss.But one local, who did not want to give his name, and who does work with some of the mosques in the neighbourhood said the main problem isn’t poverty or lack of work.“The problem are ideas, not the people,” he said.He said Wahhabism, a conservative strand of Islam, has taken root and attracted a youth who before had no particular interest in religion.Many of the mosques, he said, are being subsidised by Saudi Arabia.Dave Sinardet, a Belgian political scientist, said that while Wahhabism is likely having an influence on some of the people living in the neighbourhood, the reasons behind the broader phenomenon are more complex and diverse.“The thing I noticed is that a lot of people tend to project their own truths and their own convictions on what is happening,” he said.
Mogherini: This is the most serious war of our times By Eszter Zalan-euobserver
BRUSSELS, 16. Nov, 19:42-The fight against the Islamic State and the conflict in Syria is the gravest war we face in our times, the EU diplomatic chief said on Monday (16 November), following the meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.“This is not just a crisis, but the most serious war of our times,” Federica Mogherini told reporters.She repeated that Friday’s terrorist attacks in Paris that killed 129 people highlight the importance of talks on Syria in Vienna.Reflecting on the talks in Vienna on Syria over the weekend, Mogherini said that there is a sense of urgency coming from Europe, pressed both by terrorist threats and a refugee crisis, that cannot be ignored by any of the actors around the negotiating table.“This needs to come up with results sooner rather than later,” she said. "It must be a matter of months, not years."Mogherini noted that a political solution in Syria “would be the best condition to defeat Daesh,” using the Arabic name for the Islamic State group. “Putting an end to the civil war would definitely create the conditions to defeat Daesh on the ground.”As the meeting got underway the ministers stood for a minute of silence to honour the victims. European defence ministers will meet on Tuesday and discuss France's invoking of a mutual defence clause in the EU Treaty that calls for member states’ to help another member state that comes under attack.-Fear can destroy-Mogherini said she fears European societies might think that it is diversity that weakens and threatens the continent. “It is actually fear that can destroy our society from within,” she said.“Coming together in our differences is a strength,” Mogherini warned. "We need to hold onto this."The EU diplomatic chief also stressed that the Paris attacks represent an internal threat to the EU.“The profile of the terrorists so far identified tells us this is an internal threat,” she said.Mogherini added: “It's all EU citizens so far. This can change with the hours, but so far this is an issue of internal domestic security with strong links to an entity, a terrorist organization that has its main strongpoint in Syria and Iraq.”Echoing her boss, EU commission president Jean-Claude Juncker’s comments on Sunday, Mogherini said there should be no mix-up or confusion between refugees and terrorists.“It would be extremely dangerous and counter productive for our continent,” she warned, saying the refugees are fleeing the same threats that Europe now faces.
China security chief calls for greater 'de-radicalization' efforts-Reuters-nov 16,15-yahoonews
BEIJING (Reuters) - China needs to deepen its fight against separatists, intensify "de-radicalization" efforts, and increase global cooperation to defend against terrorism, the country's domestic security chief wrote on Tuesday.The Chinese government says it is facing a threat from Islamist militants and separatists in the far western region of Xinjiang, home to the Muslim Uighur people and where hundreds have died in unrest in the past three years or so.China's foreign minister has already called for greater international cooperation in its fight against Xinjiang radicals in the wake of the Paris attacks at the weekend.Writing in the ruling Communist Party's official People's Daily, Meng Jianzhu made no direct mention of Paris, but said a country's "rise and fall" would depend on how it secured itself."We must ensure that political security is put in first place, tightly prevent and strike hard against the infiltrating, subversive activities of enemy forces in accordance with the law," Meng wrote."We must deepen the anti-seperatist struggle and resolutely maintain ethnic and national unity," he added."Always maintain high pressure on violent terrorist activities ... further deepen de-radical ization efforts and international anti-terrorism cooperation to form a protective anti-terror security screen." Rights groups and exiles say Xinjiang's violence stems more from widespread resentment at Chinese controls on religion and culture rather than being committed by a well-organized militant group. China strongly denies abusing human rights in Xinjiang.Uighurs have traditionally followed a moderate form of Islam but many have begun adopting practices more common in Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, such as full-face veils for women, as China has stepped up security in recent years.The government has responded by cracking down on what it sees as overt signs of religiosity, like veils or beards.Meng said that China needs to build on the legal basis of its sweeping new national security law, passed earlier this year to widespread criticism from rights groups. Foreign business lobbies have also criticized the law, which included measures to tighten cyber security for key network infrastructure and information systems.China should push forward with three other laws, on anti-terror, the management of foreign non-governmental organizations and cybersecurity, Meng added, without giving details.The state also needs to "perfect" its national security approval system for things like investment projects and internet technology, Meng said.Foreign firms fear those measures could require them t make products in China or release information to inspectors that could compromise control of intellectual property.(Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)
Why the Paris attacks overshadowed Beirut bombings-By Caitlin Dickson-NOV 16,15-YAHOO NEWS
It might be nearly impossible to find a social media-using member of Western society whose Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter feeds were not filled with tributes to Paris this weekend — whether in the form of French flag filtered photos, a widely shared illustration of the Eiffel Tower at the center of a peace sign, or simply the hashtag #PrayForParis.But, as the New York Times pointed out on Sunday, a scan of the same social media feeds would not likely produce much evidence of the fact that, just one day before over 120 people were killed in a string of consecutive attacks around Paris, dual suicide bombings took more than 40 lives in the Lebanese city of Beirut — the Islamic State terrorist organization (also known as ISIS) having claimed responsibility for both. Once news of the Beirut attacks did start to spread online, however, the response was less an outpouring of support and more an outpouring of outrage and attempts to blame either the media or the public for overlooking Lebanon.In a post at Medium, journalist Martin Belam expressed his frustration over a widely shared tweet claiming that “no media” had covered the Beirut attacks when, in reality, Belam wrote, “search Google News and you will find pages and pages of reports of the attacks in Beirut. Pages and pages and pages. Over 1,286 articles in fact — lots of which pre-date the attacks in Paris.”That same tweet elicited a similar reaction from Vox’s Max Fisher, who wrote, “The New York Times covered it. The Washington Post, in addition to running an Associated Press story on it, sent reporter Hugh Naylor to cover the blasts and then write a lengthy piece on their aftermath. The Economist had a thoughtful piece reflecting on the attack's significance. CNN, which rightly or wrongly has a reputation for least-common-denominator news judgment, aired one segment after another on the Beirut bombings. Even the Daily Mail, a British tabloid most known for its gossipy royals coverage, was on the story. And on and on.”Yet, Fisher continued, “these are stories that, like so many stories of previous bombings and mass acts of violence outside of the West, readers have largely ignored.”A request for data on Twitter responses to the Paris attacks was quickly met with a colorful visualization of the #PrayForParis hashtag’s climb from a single tweet to 6.7 million within 10 hours, and another similarly illustrating the trajectory of #PortOuverte. That hashtag (meaning “open door”) was used by Parisians offering shelter to those in need following Friday’s attacks and according to Twitter was tweeted 1 million times in 10 hours.Similar statistics on Twitter’s response to the Beirut attacks, however, were neither as readily available nor brightly illustrated. A Twitter spokesperson referred Yahoo News to the public analytics service Topsy, which showed that the number of tweets containing the keyword “Beirut” started to climb from an average of around zero on Wednesday and peaked at 142,658 on Friday.Facebook did not respond to a request for data on its users’ activity relating to the events in Paris or Beirut.Pamela Rutledge, a professor of media psychology and director of the Media Psychology Research Center at Fielding Graduate University in Santa Barbara, argues that the disparity between reactions to the events in Paris and Beirut from Westerners, and Americans in particular, is more an issue of understanding than wilful ignorance.“People in the U.S. are much more familiar with Paris than Beirut,” Rutledge told Yahoo News. “We have this image of Paris as the place where Hemingway wrote or the place where you learn to paint or cook. “There’s this long history — they gave us the Statue of Liberty for heaven’s sake — and an understanding of Paris in each of our brains.”Most Americans, she explained, can easily visualize Paris in their minds, whether they are recalling an image from their own experience as a tourist or a scene from one of the countless movies set in the French city. The Middle East, on the other hand, is generally more difficult to grasp.“It’s a hugely diverse area of the world, but our sense of it is very limited by the small amount of information that we have,” said Rutledge. “And because many of the areas, especially around Beirut, have been in turmoil for so long, the images rooted in our brains are of violence and conflict.”“When we hear there’s violence over there, we think, in an uneducated way, ‘Aren’t they always fighting?’ There’s that lack understanding about what's going on there.”Not only is our capacity for empathy tied to our ability to visualize a place or a situation but also, Rutledge said, our brains are hardwired to judge whether something is dangerous based on how relevant we think it is to our own lives. And the Paris attacks, she noted, hit particularly close to home. Friday’s victims were sports fans, concertgoers, and restaurant patrons. The people held hostage at the Bataclan Theater were there to see an American band perform. Among those killed was a college student from California.Such events “shatter our image of how the world is supposed to work,” Rutledge said.Still, while the average American may be inclined to feel more of an emotional response to the attacks in Paris than those in Beirut, Rutledge said she hopes these parallel tragedies might result in greater awareness and a changed perspective.“For a long time people were not taking the ISIS threat seriously because it was in a part of the world that didn’t seem personal, but now it is,” Rutledge said, suggesting that now “people might think, Paris and Beirut are related, and understand people in the Middle East are under attack from ISIS too. We are on the same side here.”
Can governors legally reject Syrian refugees?-Liz Goodwin-Senior National Affairs Reporter-November 16, 2015-YAHOONEWS
At least 16 governors, all but one of them Republican, have vowed not to accept any refugees from Syria into their states in response to the revelation that one of the Paris terrorists may have entered Europe as part of a wave of migrants from the war-torn region. The move complicates the Obama administration’s plan to accept 10,000 Syrians into the country over the next year.“I will not stand complicit to a policy that places the citizens of Alabama in harm’s way,” Gov. Robert Bentley of Alabama announced Monday. Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal also refused to accept any more refugees and demanded that the Obama administration “confirm the identities” of 59 Syrians recently settled in his state. The governors of Indiana, Michigan, Arkansas, Texas, Mississippi, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Maine and Arizona also stated their opposition to accepting Syrian refugees. Meanwhile, presidential candidates Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz have suggested that only Christians from the region should be granted refuge.“That’s shameful. That’s not American, it’s not who we are,“ President Obama responded Monday.These governors are likely standing on shaky ground, as there is no legal way for them to prevent refugee resettlement, according to multiple experts. And their opposition is largely symbolic, since once Syrians (or any refugees) are in the U.S., they have the right to travel anywhere they want, just like any other resident. If the Obama administration wanted to challenge these governors on their threats, they would handily beat them in court, experts say.Lavinia Limon, former director of the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement under Pres. Bill Clinton, said these governors misunderstand the Constitution.“It’s really a question of fundamental freedoms,” Limon said. “If you’re legally residing in the United States, you have the right to move wherever you wish to. We could resettle a refugee in New York City today, and tomorrow they could decide to move to Dallas.”But that might not matter. Refugee resettlement involves the coordination of local nonprofits and government officials with federal agencies, and forcing newly arrived legal residents into communities that don’t want them likely sounds unappealing to everyone involved.“My suspicion is that if a state was firmly opposed to having Syrian refugees in their borders then as an initial matter, the government might choose to put them somewhere else,” said Jack Chin, a law professor at the University of California at Davis. “Why fight that fight?”State Department spokesman Mark Toner’s muted reaction to the governors’ threats on Monday seemed to confirm that suspicion. Toner told reporters Monday that the department’s lawyers were reviewing the question of whether governors could refuse to settle Syrian refugees. He struck a conciliatory note, saying he understood the governors’ concerns but reassured them that the department’s security vetting of Syrian refugees was thorough.“Our approach to this is: You have concerns? Let’s have a dialogue. Let’s try to address those concerns, alleviate those concerns,” Toner said.Limon asked how governors would follow through on their threats, if the government did choose to ignore them.“What are they going to do? Send state marshals to the airports?”The image of a Syrian family being forcibly marched across state lines would not be a winning one.Still, the governors’ move puts pressure on Obama, who has pledged to resettle 10,000 Syrians over the next year. This is less than 1 percent of the more than 4 million people who have fled the country, most of them women and children.The power to set refugee policy was granted to the State Department and the White House through the United States Refugee Act of 1980. So far, this right has gone largely unchallenged by states.“I don’t know of any case law that would precede this where a state has said no, and the federal government had to exercise its power through a lawsuit,” said Westy Egmont, a professor specializing in immigration at Boston College. “I do not think it’s been tested.”Occasionally, federal officials work with local politicians who express concerns about the number of refugees in their state to come to a resolution. Governor Deal of Georgia had asked for a moratorium on refugees a couple of years ago because he felt there were not enough jobs for native Georgians. The federal government paused the refugee flow and addressed Deal’s concerns, and eventually he agreed to accept refugees again.But Limon said this situation is different.“We don’t allow people to dictate on the basis of race, religion or ethnicity about who comes to the community,” she said.If governors wanted to legally deny entry to Syrians, Congress would have to change the law and specifically exclude Syrians from the refugee program for foreign policy reasons. This would most likely be deemed constitutional, according to Chin.The Senate is scheduled to vote on legislation banning so-called sanctuary cities this week — a measure pushed by Sen. Ted Cruz — and it’s possible that Syrian refugees will get brought up as part of the larger debate on that immigration issue. Still, it’s hard to imagine that such a move would pass the Senate, much less be signed into law by Obama.
OTHER FRANCE BOMBING NEWS
http://ift.tt/1S0sxif
via EVENTS IN TIME (BIBLE PROPHECY LITERALLY FULFILLED)(BY GOD) http://ift.tt/1kBka2j
No comments:
Post a Comment