JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
GALTIONS 6:7
7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
OTHER WORST HISTORY TERRORIST ORLANDO STORIES
http://ift.tt/1Ur1jnw
http://ift.tt/1tCxyI1
http://ift.tt/21s8AW6
http://ift.tt/1UznHwc
http://ift.tt/1WOfC8X
http://ift.tt/1UbznHj
http://ift.tt/25W5KPL
http://ift.tt/1UPUau2
http://ift.tt/233F2Qa
CITY OF ORLANDO
http://ift.tt/Vd8Xls
http://ift.tt/233FVZ1
NEWS
http://ift.tt/1OkpQLA
VICTIM NAME WEBSITE
http://ift.tt/233F3Uc
GALTIONS 6:7
7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
OTHER WORST HISTORY TERRORIST ORLANDO STORIES
http://ift.tt/1Ur1jnw
http://ift.tt/1tCxyI1
http://ift.tt/21s8AW6
http://ift.tt/1UznHwc
http://ift.tt/1WOfC8X
http://ift.tt/1UbznHj
http://ift.tt/25W5KPL
http://ift.tt/1UPUau2
http://ift.tt/233F2Qa
CITY OF ORLANDO
http://ift.tt/Vd8Xls
http://ift.tt/233FVZ1
NEWS
http://ift.tt/1OkpQLA
VICTIM NAME WEBSITE
http://ift.tt/233F3Uc
UPDATE-JUNE 20,2016-12:00AM
THE GODLESS LIBERAL-DEMOCRATS AND THE OBAMA MOMMA SUNNI-ARAB-MUSLIM ARE ALL WANTING GUNS BANNED AS A RESULT OF THIS ISLAMIC-MUSLIM DEATH CULT MURDER OF 49 SODOMITES. THE LOONIE LEFT AND LUKEWARM GODLESS WANT TO MAKE THIS A GUN AND SODOMITE HATE CRIME. INSTEAD OF WHAT IT TRULY IS. AN ISLAMIC-QURANIC-MUSLIM-ALLU-AK-BAR-MUHAMMAD-DEATH CULT-MOON WAR GOD ALLAH TERRORIST ATTACK ON ISLAMIC HATING SODOMITES. AND NOBODYS GONNA EVER TELL ME ANYTHING DIFFERENT. THESE GODLESS LOONIES MAY HAVE THEIR HEADS IN THE SAND-NOT ME. I'M GONNA SPEAK TRUTH.NOT LIES. I GUESS THE LEFT-WING NUTJOBS THINK ALL THE GUN MURDERS IN CHICAGO ARE SODOMITE HATE CRIMES TO. BUT THEY WOULD NEVER SAY THAT. BECAUSE IF YOU TALK OUT AGAINST BLACKS KILLING BLACKS BY THE HUNDREDS EVERY MONTH IN CHICAGO.YOUR A RACIST-HATER-BIGOT. BUT DO THESE NUTJOB LEFT-LIBERAL-DEMOCRATS CALL FOR A BAN ON ALL GUNS IN CHICAGO TO STOP THIS THUG-BLACK-GANGLAND SLAUGHTER OF INNOCENT PEOPLE. NO. CAN WE SAY THESE POLITICALLY CORRECT LEFT-NUTJOB-LIBERAL-DEMOCRATS ARE A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES. THAT CRY FOWL AGAINST GUNS WHEN THEIR SODOMITE PALS GET MURDERED BY ISLAMIC RADICALS. BUT STILL LET BLACK THUGS-GANG BANG-DRUG DEALERS - DRIVE BY SHOOTERS KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE IN CHICAGO ON A DAILY BASIS. OH I FORGOT BECAUSE OF THE BAD ECONOMY-THE BLACKS ARE ALLOWED TO KILL AND SLAUGHTER INNOCENT PEOPLE IN CHICAGO AND GET AWAY WITH IT. FOR THE GOOD OF THE LEFT-WING-LIBERAL-DEMOCRAT CAUSE OF COURSE. AND THERES NO BAN ON GUNS IN CHICAGO.
THE GODLESS LIBERAL-DEMOCRATS AND THE OBAMA MOMMA SUNNI-ARAB-MUSLIM ARE ALL WANTING GUNS BANNED AS A RESULT OF THIS ISLAMIC-MUSLIM DEATH CULT MURDER OF 49 SODOMITES. THE LOONIE LEFT AND LUKEWARM GODLESS WANT TO MAKE THIS A GUN AND SODOMITE HATE CRIME. INSTEAD OF WHAT IT TRULY IS. AN ISLAMIC-QURANIC-MUSLIM-ALLU-AK-BAR-MUHAMMAD-DEATH CULT-MOON WAR GOD ALLAH TERRORIST ATTACK ON ISLAMIC HATING SODOMITES. AND NOBODYS GONNA EVER TELL ME ANYTHING DIFFERENT. THESE GODLESS LOONIES MAY HAVE THEIR HEADS IN THE SAND-NOT ME. I'M GONNA SPEAK TRUTH.NOT LIES. I GUESS THE LEFT-WING NUTJOBS THINK ALL THE GUN MURDERS IN CHICAGO ARE SODOMITE HATE CRIMES TO. BUT THEY WOULD NEVER SAY THAT. BECAUSE IF YOU TALK OUT AGAINST BLACKS KILLING BLACKS BY THE HUNDREDS EVERY MONTH IN CHICAGO.YOUR A RACIST-HATER-BIGOT. BUT DO THESE NUTJOB LEFT-LIBERAL-DEMOCRATS CALL FOR A BAN ON ALL GUNS IN CHICAGO TO STOP THIS THUG-BLACK-GANGLAND SLAUGHTER OF INNOCENT PEOPLE. NO. CAN WE SAY THESE POLITICALLY CORRECT LEFT-NUTJOB-LIBERAL-DEMOCRATS ARE A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES. THAT CRY FOWL AGAINST GUNS WHEN THEIR SODOMITE PALS GET MURDERED BY ISLAMIC RADICALS. BUT STILL LET BLACK THUGS-GANG BANG-DRUG DEALERS - DRIVE BY SHOOTERS KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE IN CHICAGO ON A DAILY BASIS. OH I FORGOT BECAUSE OF THE BAD ECONOMY-THE BLACKS ARE ALLOWED TO KILL AND SLAUGHTER INNOCENT PEOPLE IN CHICAGO AND GET AWAY WITH IT. FOR THE GOOD OF THE LEFT-WING-LIBERAL-DEMOCRAT CAUSE OF COURSE. AND THERES NO BAN ON GUNS IN CHICAGO.
U.S. attorney general: Florida shooting "act of terror, act of hate"-[Reuters]-June 19, 2016-yahoonews
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said on Sunday that last week's shooting massacre in Orlando, Florida, was "an act of terror and an act of hate", but she declined to divulge what charges may be filed or who may be charged in the case.Lynch told CNN's "State of the Union" program that she would be going to Orlando on Tuesday to confer with investigators, and on Monday would release transcripts of phone conversations between the deceased shooter, Omar Mateen, and police as the worst mass shooting incident in American history unfolded."We're going back and looking at everything we did in our investigation of the killer and our subsequent contact with him, but also, all the information we are receiving to trying and learn his motivations. This was an act of terror and an act of hate," Lynch told CNN.(Reporting By David Lawder; Editing by Gareth Jones)
U.S. Supreme Court may take action on state assault weapon bans-[Reuters]-June 19, 2016-yahoonews
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court may weigh in this week on gun control, an issue smoldering again following the June 12 Orlando massacre, with the justices due to decide whether to hear a challenge by gun rights advocates to assault weapon bans in two states.The Connecticut and New York laws prohibit semiautomatic weapons like the one used by the gunman who fatally shot 49 people at a gay night club in Orlando in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.The Supreme Court will announce as soon as Monday whether it will hear the challenge brought by gun rights groups and individual firearms owners asserting that the laws violate the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment guarantee of the right to bear arms.The court has not decided a major gun case since 2010.If they take up the matter, the justices would hear arguments in their next term, which begins in October. A decision not to hear the challenge would leave in place lower-court rulings upholding the laws.The court's action in another recent appeal indicated it may be disinclined to take up the matter. The justices in December opted not to hear a challenge to a Highland Park, Illinois ordinance banning assault weapons and large-capacity magazines.A national assault weapons ban expired in 2004. Congressional Republicans, backed by the influential National Rifle Association gun rights lobby, beat back efforts to restore it. Some states and municipalities have enacted their own bans.In their petition asking the Supreme Court to hear the case, those challenging the Connecticut law said the type of weapons banned by the state are used in self-defense, hunting and recreational shooting.Connecticut said its law targets firearms disproportionately used in gun crime, "particularly the most heinous forms of gun violence." It said people in Connecticut still can legally own more than 1,000 types of handguns, rifles and shotguns.There is a longstanding legal debate over the scope of Second Amendment rights.In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court held for the first time that the Second Amendment guaranteed an individual's right to bear arms, but the ruling applied only to firearms kept in the home for self-defense. That ruling did not involve a state law, applying only to federal regulations.Two years later, in the case McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court held that the Heller ruling covered individual gun rights in states.(Editing by Will Dunham)
Orlando attacks renew focus on security at smaller U.S. businesses-[By Nick Carey]-June 19, 2016-yahoonews
CHICAGO (Reuters) - While mass shooting attacks are on the rise, smaller U.S. businesses remain reluctant to invest in more physical security measures such as metal detectors or extra guards even though events like the Orlando massacre prompt a surge in interest, industry executives said.Major attacks like the one at a gay nightclub in Orlando, which left 49 people dead, often prompt a flurry of inquiries from potential customers to security companies. But the calls fail to translate into meaningful sales as owners tally the cost of the equipment and the extra personnel needed."With past mass shooting events people want to know how much additional security costs. Then they go, 'Gulp,'" said Bruce McIndoe, chief executive of risk advisory firm iJet International Inc.Those include upfront expenses like equipment and training as well as ongoing costs such as wages for guards. For nightclubs, minor sports venues, shopping malls and smaller college campuses, the financial burden can be too great.The trend stands in contrast to Europe, where companies say sales can spike after a major incident, such as the coordinated attacks on restaurants, a concert hall and soccer stadium in Paris in November that killed 130 people.The very next day, privately held First Texas Products sold 18 walk-through metal detectors that can cost up to $5,000 each to another stadium in France, said Tom Walsh, the company's chief executive.However, Walsh and other industry executives say the scope of the Orlando attack may lead more U.S. businesses, especially big ones, to invest in physical security measures already in place at sports stadiums, government buildings and airports.This week, a large U.S. retailer contacted First Texas Products to launch a test of its hand-held security wands, which start at around $100 each, in 50 stores. "They specifically mentioned the Orlando shootings," Walsh said in an email. He declined to name the client.Michael Gips of ASIS International, an association that represents more than 35,000 security professionals worldwide, said many businesses "roll the dice" over physical security.U.S. movie theaters have generally not installed metal detectors following the 2012 slaying of 12 people at a theater in Aurora, Colorado, because "it could drive customers away," he said. But he expects consumer concerns will change that calculus."Over time, I think people will expect a better degree of security if we continue to see shootings like this and that's what will drive change," Gips said.-COST OF DOING NOTHING-ASIS International estimates U.S. private sector spending on security goods and services jumped 18 percent to $377 billion in 2015 from 2013 and is "pushing $400 billion" this year, Gips said.Much of that growth has been driven by spending on surveillance equipment and on cyber protections following high-profile data breaches, such as the one that hit retailer Target Corp in 2013.Metal detectors debuted at U.S. airports in the early 1970s after a series of airplane hijackings. Government buildings and large public venues began installing them following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.Metal detectors are now mandatory at all major league U.S. football, baseball, basketball, hockey and football games. But their use has been slow to spread elsewhere, even though many security consultants see metal detectors as an effective first-line deterrent. "The harder a target you make yourself appear, the more likely potential attackers will go elsewhere," said Jason Porter, regional managing director for risk management firm Pinkerton. Smaller venues need to weigh their options carefully, said Luca Cacioli, director of U.S. operations for Italian firm CEIA, one of the world's largest metal detector manufacturers.At the same time, he said, "the cost of not doing anything or implementing ineffective solutions is certainly a key consideration."(Reporting by Nick Carey; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Cynthia Osterman)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said on Sunday that last week's shooting massacre in Orlando, Florida, was "an act of terror and an act of hate", but she declined to divulge what charges may be filed or who may be charged in the case.Lynch told CNN's "State of the Union" program that she would be going to Orlando on Tuesday to confer with investigators, and on Monday would release transcripts of phone conversations between the deceased shooter, Omar Mateen, and police as the worst mass shooting incident in American history unfolded."We're going back and looking at everything we did in our investigation of the killer and our subsequent contact with him, but also, all the information we are receiving to trying and learn his motivations. This was an act of terror and an act of hate," Lynch told CNN.(Reporting By David Lawder; Editing by Gareth Jones)
U.S. Supreme Court may take action on state assault weapon bans-[Reuters]-June 19, 2016-yahoonews
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court may weigh in this week on gun control, an issue smoldering again following the June 12 Orlando massacre, with the justices due to decide whether to hear a challenge by gun rights advocates to assault weapon bans in two states.The Connecticut and New York laws prohibit semiautomatic weapons like the one used by the gunman who fatally shot 49 people at a gay night club in Orlando in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.The Supreme Court will announce as soon as Monday whether it will hear the challenge brought by gun rights groups and individual firearms owners asserting that the laws violate the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment guarantee of the right to bear arms.The court has not decided a major gun case since 2010.If they take up the matter, the justices would hear arguments in their next term, which begins in October. A decision not to hear the challenge would leave in place lower-court rulings upholding the laws.The court's action in another recent appeal indicated it may be disinclined to take up the matter. The justices in December opted not to hear a challenge to a Highland Park, Illinois ordinance banning assault weapons and large-capacity magazines.A national assault weapons ban expired in 2004. Congressional Republicans, backed by the influential National Rifle Association gun rights lobby, beat back efforts to restore it. Some states and municipalities have enacted their own bans.In their petition asking the Supreme Court to hear the case, those challenging the Connecticut law said the type of weapons banned by the state are used in self-defense, hunting and recreational shooting.Connecticut said its law targets firearms disproportionately used in gun crime, "particularly the most heinous forms of gun violence." It said people in Connecticut still can legally own more than 1,000 types of handguns, rifles and shotguns.There is a longstanding legal debate over the scope of Second Amendment rights.In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court held for the first time that the Second Amendment guaranteed an individual's right to bear arms, but the ruling applied only to firearms kept in the home for self-defense. That ruling did not involve a state law, applying only to federal regulations.Two years later, in the case McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court held that the Heller ruling covered individual gun rights in states.(Editing by Will Dunham)
Orlando attacks renew focus on security at smaller U.S. businesses-[By Nick Carey]-June 19, 2016-yahoonews
CHICAGO (Reuters) - While mass shooting attacks are on the rise, smaller U.S. businesses remain reluctant to invest in more physical security measures such as metal detectors or extra guards even though events like the Orlando massacre prompt a surge in interest, industry executives said.Major attacks like the one at a gay nightclub in Orlando, which left 49 people dead, often prompt a flurry of inquiries from potential customers to security companies. But the calls fail to translate into meaningful sales as owners tally the cost of the equipment and the extra personnel needed."With past mass shooting events people want to know how much additional security costs. Then they go, 'Gulp,'" said Bruce McIndoe, chief executive of risk advisory firm iJet International Inc.Those include upfront expenses like equipment and training as well as ongoing costs such as wages for guards. For nightclubs, minor sports venues, shopping malls and smaller college campuses, the financial burden can be too great.The trend stands in contrast to Europe, where companies say sales can spike after a major incident, such as the coordinated attacks on restaurants, a concert hall and soccer stadium in Paris in November that killed 130 people.The very next day, privately held First Texas Products sold 18 walk-through metal detectors that can cost up to $5,000 each to another stadium in France, said Tom Walsh, the company's chief executive.However, Walsh and other industry executives say the scope of the Orlando attack may lead more U.S. businesses, especially big ones, to invest in physical security measures already in place at sports stadiums, government buildings and airports.This week, a large U.S. retailer contacted First Texas Products to launch a test of its hand-held security wands, which start at around $100 each, in 50 stores. "They specifically mentioned the Orlando shootings," Walsh said in an email. He declined to name the client.Michael Gips of ASIS International, an association that represents more than 35,000 security professionals worldwide, said many businesses "roll the dice" over physical security.U.S. movie theaters have generally not installed metal detectors following the 2012 slaying of 12 people at a theater in Aurora, Colorado, because "it could drive customers away," he said. But he expects consumer concerns will change that calculus."Over time, I think people will expect a better degree of security if we continue to see shootings like this and that's what will drive change," Gips said.-COST OF DOING NOTHING-ASIS International estimates U.S. private sector spending on security goods and services jumped 18 percent to $377 billion in 2015 from 2013 and is "pushing $400 billion" this year, Gips said.Much of that growth has been driven by spending on surveillance equipment and on cyber protections following high-profile data breaches, such as the one that hit retailer Target Corp in 2013.Metal detectors debuted at U.S. airports in the early 1970s after a series of airplane hijackings. Government buildings and large public venues began installing them following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.Metal detectors are now mandatory at all major league U.S. football, baseball, basketball, hockey and football games. But their use has been slow to spread elsewhere, even though many security consultants see metal detectors as an effective first-line deterrent. "The harder a target you make yourself appear, the more likely potential attackers will go elsewhere," said Jason Porter, regional managing director for risk management firm Pinkerton. Smaller venues need to weigh their options carefully, said Luca Cacioli, director of U.S. operations for Italian firm CEIA, one of the world's largest metal detector manufacturers.At the same time, he said, "the cost of not doing anything or implementing ineffective solutions is certainly a key consideration."(Reporting by Nick Carey; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Cynthia Osterman)
via EVENTS IN TIME (BIBLE PROPHECY LITERALLY FULFILLED)(BY GOD) http://ift.tt/1Y3mlwQ
No comments:
Post a Comment